See the name of this forum, Kink Talk, the idea is we talk about kink, get it?
But it seems the forum has degenerated into some kind meeting ground for the posting of lame, softcore photos, the kink has pretty much gone.
If you look at most picture posting sites they will categorise things into softcore, for nude or semi-nude, hardcore for full on porn and usually there will be a little section for kink or bdsm.
Thats because kink isn't common, its unusual, which is why this site was founded for the kinky people to get together and discuss their kinks. Things like bondage, S&M, whips, chains, watersports, and so on.
You'll notice that list doesn't include looking at nude photos and thats because that's a mainstream activity with thousands of sites catering to it. Go visit xhamster or imagefap and you'll have an endless supply of wank material, it will be much better quality and it won't have your IP address stamped all over it.
Yes my big beef is this explosion of so called "exposure" kink. It's not a kink, its not remotely kinky, its just for the most part softcore nudity.
This temp exposed kind of thing reminds me of when I used to talk girls into going behind the bike shed for a quick peek up their skirt and I don't know about you but I grew out of that before high school.
Its not the nudity thats the problem, its the setting, it has no context. If on the other hand the nudity happens in an unusually setting that can make it kinky. Outdoors or in other public places makes it risky exposure, not common so it qualifies as a kink. Or if the photos are in some way humiliating or contain some kind of kinky element, a clothes peg or a bit of rope even?
But no, most are blurry, out of focus badly cropped crap and in many cases not even of the purported poster but stolen from another website!
This marks my 900th post, I like to talk about kink, how about you?
But it seems the forum has degenerated into some kind meeting ground for the posting of lame, softcore photos, the kink has pretty much gone.
If you look at most picture posting sites they will categorise things into softcore, for nude or semi-nude, hardcore for full on porn and usually there will be a little section for kink or bdsm.
Thats because kink isn't common, its unusual, which is why this site was founded for the kinky people to get together and discuss their kinks. Things like bondage, S&M, whips, chains, watersports, and so on.
You'll notice that list doesn't include looking at nude photos and thats because that's a mainstream activity with thousands of sites catering to it. Go visit xhamster or imagefap and you'll have an endless supply of wank material, it will be much better quality and it won't have your IP address stamped all over it.
Yes my big beef is this explosion of so called "exposure" kink. It's not a kink, its not remotely kinky, its just for the most part softcore nudity.
This temp exposed kind of thing reminds me of when I used to talk girls into going behind the bike shed for a quick peek up their skirt and I don't know about you but I grew out of that before high school.
Its not the nudity thats the problem, its the setting, it has no context. If on the other hand the nudity happens in an unusually setting that can make it kinky. Outdoors or in other public places makes it risky exposure, not common so it qualifies as a kink. Or if the photos are in some way humiliating or contain some kind of kinky element, a clothes peg or a bit of rope even?
But no, most are blurry, out of focus badly cropped crap and in many cases not even of the purported poster but stolen from another website!
This marks my 900th post, I like to talk about kink, how about you?
Last edited: